CESAR Classic Loaf in Sauce Filet Mignon vs Purina Pro Plan Sensitive Skin & Stomach Lamb & Oat Meal Entree in Gravy
Order follows the Universal Score — the same deterministic engine, the same rules, for every product. Brands can't pay for placement.
The scores
Bowlmark scores are independent opinions based on published label information and cited references. They are educational, not veterinary advice, and no substitute for your vet — especially for medical conditions or prescription diets.
Pillar by pillar
Weighted pillar contributions from each product's stored score — nutritional adequacy, ingredient quality, additives & processing, transparency.
| Metric | CESAR | Purina Pro Plan |
|---|---|---|
| Nutritional adequacy | 21 | 35 |
| Ingredient quality | 26 | 11 |
| Additives & processing | 18 | 20 |
| Transparency | 6 | 6 |
Guaranteed analysis
As printed on each label; dry-matter protein removes the moisture so wet and dry read on the same basis.
| Metric | CESAR | Purina Pro Plan |
|---|---|---|
| Protein | 9% | 9% |
| Fat | 4% | 3% |
| Fiber | 1% | 1.5% |
| Moisture | 82% | 79.5% |
| Protein (dry-matter) | 50% | 43.9% |
First five ingredients
CESAR
- Beef
- Pork By-Products
- Chicken Liver
- Chicken Broth
- Water
Purina Pro Plan
- Water
- lamb
- wheat gluten
- liver
- meat by-products
Flags on the label
CESAR
- No nutritional-adequacy statement
Purina Pro Plan
- Unnamed animal ingredient ("meat by-product")
Cite this page
Bowlmark. "CESAR Classic Loaf in Sauce Filet Mignon vs Purina Pro Plan Sensitive Skin & Stomach Lamb & Oat Meal Entree in Gravy." https://www.bowlmark.com/compare/cesar-classic-loaf-in-sauce-filet-mignon-vs-purina-pro-plan-sensitive-skin-and-stomach-lamb-and-oat-meal-entree-in-gravy
- Engine
- Methodology engine v1.1.0 · config 13c99e2f
- Verified
- Last verified August 20, 2026
The engine and config above are the ones stamped on this page's score — the exact pair that produced the number shown.