Field guides

By-products and meals, without the panic

No two label words carry more baggage than 'by-product' and 'meal' — and most of the baggage is misplaced. The honest question isn't whether a food contains them. It's whether the label says which animal they came from.

What the words legally mean

'Chicken' on an ingredient panel means flesh and skin, with or without bone — weighed raw, water included. 'Chicken meal' is the same material rendered: cooked down, fat and water driven off, ground into a concentrated powder. 'Chicken by-products' are the parts beyond muscle meat — liver, kidneys, other organs — excluding feathers and a few defined exclusions. Each term has an AAFCO definition; none of them is a synonym for waste.

Meals: concentration, not corner-cutting

Because rendering removes the water, a meal delivers far more protein per kilogram than the fresh ingredient it came from. A food with chicken meal second on the panel can carry more actual chicken protein than one with fresh chicken first — fresh chicken is roughly 70% water, and the ingredient list counts water weight. 'Made with fresh chicken, no meals' reads premium and can mean less chicken in the bowl.

By-products: the organ-meat question

Here's the uncomfortable fact for by-product avoidance: organs are among the most nutrient-dense things a dog or cat can eat, and a wild carnivore eats them first. Veterinary nutritionists — including the American College of Veterinary Nutrition — are consistent on this: by-products can be perfectly nutritious. A food isn't better because its liver is listed as 'liver' instead of arriving inside 'chicken by-products'; it's just labeled differently.

The actual tell: named versus unnamed

What does separate foods is whether the species is on record. 'Chicken by-product meal' names its source; 'meat and bone meal', 'poultry by-product', 'animal fat' don't — and what's behind an unnamed term can change from batch to batch with the commodity market. Consistency matters for sensitive pets, and anonymity is also where quality problems hide. That's the line the scoring engine draws: named animal sources score, unnamed ones cost points, and 'by-product' itself triggers only a neutral informational note.

How to use this on a real label

Skip the front-of-bag vocabulary war entirely. Read the first five ingredients and ask one question of each animal term: does it name the species? A panel full of named sources — whatever mix of fresh, meal and by-product — beats a shorter, prettier panel built on 'meat' and 'animal'. That's the whole trick.

What Bowlmark does with this

The engine takes the same position the veterinary nutrition bodies do — by-products get a neutral informational note, never a penalty by themselves, while unnamed animal sources cost ingredient-pillar points and named ones earn them. The word isn't the problem; the anonymity is.

Read the methodology

Bowlmark scores are independent opinions based on published label information and cited references. They are educational, not veterinary advice, and no substitute for your vet — especially for medical conditions or prescription diets.